AI Review

AI review reads your entire manuscript and evaluates every checklist item automatically, returning an item-by-item compliance report, a pass rate, identified issues, and an overall recommendation.


How AI review runs

When you select AI review, the module works through these steps:

  1. Loading checklist from database -- the checklist for your study type is fetched from the data service. If no checklist exists, the review stops with an error.
  2. Preparing manuscript for analysis -- your PDF is converted to base64.
  3. Analyzing manuscript against checklist criteria -- the manuscript and checklist are sent to the platform's server-side analysis function, which runs the AI evaluation.
  4. Processing results -- the returned evaluation is assembled into the review result.

The analysis sends three things to the server: the manuscript (as base64), the study type, and the checklist questions for that type.


What the AI returns per item

For each checklist item, the AI returns:

FieldMeaning
questionThe checklist item evaluated
answerWhether the manuscript adequately addresses it (true/false)
justificationThe AI's explanation for its judgement
confidenceAn optional confidence value (%) for that item

The justification makes the review auditable: for every item, you can read why the AI reached its conclusion.


The overall result

Across all items, the AI review produces:

OutputContents
Pass ratePassed items / total items as percentage
Item-by-item listEvery checklist item with answer, justification, and confidence
Major issuesSignificant reporting gaps identified
Minor issuesSmaller reporting gaps identified
Overall assessmentNarrative summary of compliance
RecommendationAccept / Minor Revisions / Major Revisions / Reject

The pass rate is the proportion of checklist items the manuscript satisfied. The recommendation defaults to Major Revisions if the analysis does not return an explicit one.


Exporting the report

The AI review result can be exported as a PDF report containing the recommendation, overall assessment, major and minor issues, and the full item-by-item list with justifications. This gives you a shareable compliance report for submission materials or revision guidance.


AI review vs manual review

Manual reviewAI review
Item judgementYou answer yes/no per itemAI answers per item with justification
Compliance scoreImplicit (issues by severity)Explicit pass rate
Recommendation sourceComputed from escalation rulesReturned by AI analysis
Issue listsMajor/minor from item categoriesMajor/minor identified by analysis
ExportOn-screen resultsOn-screen + PDF export
Review ChatAvailable when the manual result identifies issuesNot available on the AI result screen

The AI review's per-item judgements should be checked against the manuscript using the justifications provided. The issue lists and recommendation focus your attention but do not substitute for final human judgement.


The complete picture

Upload PDF
   |
Determine study type (survey / manual / AI)
   |
Fetch matching checklist
   |
Choose review mode:
   - Manual review: you judge each item
   - AI review: the AI judges each item
   |
Compliance report (pass rate / issues / recommendation)
   |
Manual review with issues: Review Chat (discuss and plan revisions)
   |
Revise and optionally re-review

The module matches your manuscript to the right reporting guideline for its design and checks it item by item -- so reporting gaps are caught before submission, not after.